Hi,

Sorry, I was getting a little negative, this is really hard. I appreciate
any help you can give.
If I had the kernel logs, could you do something with them and help
determine what crashed.
I set up kexec, kdump to collect the logs.

Thanks,

Markus

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Nigra Truo <nigrat...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Sven,
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> On 2015-12-11 08:20 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 07:17:43PM -0800, Nigra Truo wrote:
>> >> That does not work neither unfortunately. I installed the proprietary
>> >> driver and now X crashes. At least the whole machine does not crash,
>> but I
>> >> can open a Desktop, KDE or Gnome, then open an app, maximize the
>> window and
>> >> I get a prompt crash.
>> >
>> > Oif.  I'm afraid I can't help you further here -- I'm a mere user when
>> it
>> > comes to X drivers.  I could help with installing a newer version or an
>> > alternate driver, but for more, we need actual driver guys :(
>>
>> Problem is, there is no such person in Debian for the nouveau driver.
>>
>
> Who will fix this then when nobody is in charge then?
> This problem is a huge disaster, I had about 25 restarts today already and
> can't work like this and will need to downgrade to have a stable system to
> work and troubleshoot this on the side on a test harddisk, as a test system
> as a system of this instable magnitude needs to be treated.
>
>
>
>>
>> >> The unability to get logs in the Kernel Panic is a huge problem, I
>> can't
>> >> believe that this his still not solved, that there is no automatic
>> >> mechanism, to at least see what caused the panic or, for the matter,
>> >> logging that ANY panic has occurred. Right now, the most serious of
>> errors
>> >> does not have any accounting whatsoever.
>
> >
>> > When the kernel panics, most of its facilities are considered dead.
>> Doing
>> > something as complex as a filesystem write would require temporarily
>> > ignoring the panic, with a huge risk of data corruption.  A generally
>> pretty
>> > bad idea.
>>
>
> I don't know how Windows does it, but it does remember that there was a
> bluescreen. If Windows can, so can Linux.
> Right now, I can't stop my system from restarting, I don't know what the
> hell is restarting it, if it is the watchdog service, which I deactivated
> in the kernel (and it still restarts), when I push some keys, it shows the
> kernel panic and shows the message "rebooting in 30 seconds" and when I do
> a google search, there is absolutely no reference or documentation about
> what that is, what is causing it and WHO is doing it, why the reboot?
> As of Debian Wheezy, there as absolutely no restarting when the kernel
> paniced and that is the way it needs to be.
> Now with the new kernel, it just restarts, and could easily go into a
> reboot loop, endlessly restarting. Also, it does not show anything in the
> logs, there is absolutely nothing on the system that shows the system had a
> panic or that it even crashed, which is totally horrendous, considering
> that you could have data loss and never know about it. I don't understand
> why this is solved so pathetically and half baked in the kernel.
>
> I wrote a little tool some years ago, when I was astonished at this, that
> does a really "complex" (I'm purposefully sarcastic here) functionality,
> that can tell if the system crashed, by removing a file when shutting down
> gracefully. If the file is there still when starting up, the system crashed
> in a panic.
> Now, 5 years later, I'm amazed and shocked that I seem to be the only
> person on earth that can actually tell that there has been a panic on my
> system.
> Due to this annoying auto restart, transparency has been lost and your
> system could restart 40 times on a server and have massive data loss,  you
> would never know it.
>
>  As you can see, I'm not happy about this whole mess. I now spend up to 20
> hours troubleshooting this problem and am no closer to solve this except
> knowing that I will have to downgrade if I want to use my laptop to work
> again.
>
>
> >
>> > Thus, you'd need to pass the remaining piece of the log somehow.  Ways
>> to do
>> > so include:
>> > * a serial console.  My main desktop box happens to include a real
>> serial
>> >   port, but that's sadly a rarity for modern machines these days.
>> There are
>> >   USB connectors which you could use to pass the logs from your laptop
>> to
>> >   another machine.
>> > * kdump.  This keeps a whole secondary kernel in memory which takes over
>> >   during a crash and can do a post-mortem on the primary kernel which
>> just
>> >   panicked.
>> > * some way over the network.  User-mode syslog won't work but there are
>> >   kernel-based ones, google says netdump.
>>
>> The best choice is actually netconsole, see
>> https://mraw.org/blog/2010/11/08/Debugging_using_netconsole/ and
>> Documentation/networking/netconsole.txt in the kernel source
>
>        Sven
>>
> Thanks for the link, I will check that out. I already tried to have a ssh
> link open and tail -f the kernel log, but the connection gets cut off right
> when the system crashes.
>
> Markus
>
>
>
> --
> *Por sperto kaj lerno ne sufiĉas eterno.*
>



-- 
*Por sperto kaj lerno ne sufiĉas eterno.*

Reply via email to