Am Samstag, den 06.10.2012, 08:07 +0200 schrieb Christian PERRIER:
> From your summary, I think the ideal move is having X.org upstream
> drop this font from their distribution ("picking" it from CTAN has no
> logic: if it lives on CTAN, it should be provided by TeX-related
> software, not by X.org).It might not be as easy as it seems. I have once witnessed an argument on some mailing list between TeX and Ghostscript people about who is the right "authority" to host the 35 Postscript core fonts. ;) > And, of course, also add the fontconfig file to > texlive-fonts-recommended as you suggest. In my opinion, texlive-fonts-recommended should export the psnfss fonts to fontconfig, i.e. the 35 Postscript core fonts plus Bitstream Charter and Adobe Utopia. The will end up redundant with gsfonts for the core fonts and xfonts-scalable for the Charter, but these fonts are installed as duplicates anyway and then it's up to fontconfig to choose between the alternatives. I'll post a patch against texlive-fonts-recommended soon. - Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1349553872.16748.10.camel@debian
