On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Bill Gatliff <b...@billgatliff.com> wrote: > Bryce: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Bryce Harrington <br...@canonical.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:13:26PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >>> > >From talking with lool and jcristau, it sounds like only -fbdev is >>> > really needed from this list. (Drivers that seem worth including such >>> > as -dovefb, -omapfb, -imx, etc. are not in the list and perhaps should, >>> > but that is a separate issue.) >>> >>> there's an s3c6410 one as well, somewhere around. >> >> Any idea if that is at all related to -s3 or -s3virge? If so, or if >> there's any doubt, then perhaps one or both of those should stick around >> a bit longer. But if it's a separate driver, then best to handle it >> separately with -dovefb and those others. > > I think the name "s3c6410" is a reference to an ARM-based SoC. > Completely unrelated to -s3 and -s3virge.
errmoomoommoom... ah ha! http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571950 http://gitorious.org/xf86-video-s3c64xx but to be absolutely honest, the s3c64xx was an "interim" processor, with specialised FIMD 3D graphics, only went as far as 800mhz: whilst people who have it love it, it's not really a high priority: it's kinda yesterday's processor already. a minor speedbump in the road to progress :) l. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=naowavgqbqqeedk3bms4tyoe+vjhndob2g...@mail.gmail.com
