On Fre, 2003-01-31 at 18:11, Michel Dänzer wrote: > I still don't get it. There's no incompatibility between xlibmesa3-gl, > xlibmesa4-gl and xlibmesa5-gl to come, so what's the point of the > different names? The worst thing IMHO is x-window-system-core depending > on one particular of these, but I think it would be much easier for > everyone if we had a common name which reflects the libGL API used.
Also, what's with changing the semantics of the libgl1 virtual package? Shouldn't a new one like libgl1-noglu be introduced? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
