I still don't get it. There's no incompatibility between xlibmesa3-gl, xlibmesa4-gl and xlibmesa5-gl to come, so what's the point of the different names? The worst thing IMHO is x-window-system-core depending on one particular of these, but I think it would be much easier for everyone if we had a common name which reflects the libGL API used.
Looking forward to getting clues I may be missing... -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
