Your message dated Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:19:17 +0100
with message-id <20021011101917.GC4186@polya>
and subject line Bug#163936: xserver-xfree86: should be loading xext modules!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Oct 2002 11:45:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 09 06:45:48 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (giserver.graylab.ac.uk) [212.219.87.30]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17zFHg-0000tw-00; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 06:45:48 -0500
Received: from polya ([10.0.1.152]) by giserver.graylab.ac.uk
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id H3PPXM00.C0G for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:44:10 +0100
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 17zFH6-0000up-00; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 12:45:12 +0100
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:45:12 +0100
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian bug reports <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xserver-xfree86: should be loading xext modules!
Message-ID: <20021009114511.GA3437@polya>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-1
>From my XFree86.0.log:
(II) LoadModule: "pex5"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/pex5.so
dlopen: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/pex5.so: undefined symbol: PexExtensionInitPtr
(EE) Failed to load /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/pex5.so
(II) UnloadModule: "pex5"
(EE) Failed to load module "pex5" (loader failed, 136286616)
And I discovered that I still have the old xext package installed. I
don't know why 4.2.1 is loading the old versions.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
website: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~jdg/
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/
Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 163936-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2002 10:20:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 11 05:20:34 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (giserver.graylab.ac.uk) [212.219.87.30]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17zwuH-00022L-00; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 05:20:34 -0500
Received: from polya ([10.0.1.152]) by giserver.graylab.ac.uk
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id H3TBBE00.N0B for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:18:50 +0100
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 17zwtD-0002SD-00; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:19:27 +0100
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:19:17 +0100
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#163936: xserver-xfree86: should be loading xext modules!
Message-ID: <20021011101917.GC4186@polya>
References: <20021009114511.GA3437@polya> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<20021010112827.GB4500@polya> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 04:19:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:28:27PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > 1) Do you have "pex5" listed in the "Modules" Section of your
> > > XF86Config-4?
> >
> > Yes, and xie (not that I know what they do ;-) Should I just delete
> > them?
>
> Hm. The config script should have automatically trashed them.
> [...]
> Or did you bring this on yourself by adding them by hand, and not letting
> debconf handle them?
Ah, I found that the config script wasn't quite able to handle my
needs (two mice, in particular), so I have been handling it myself.
> This is starting to sound like a non-bug.
Closing.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
website: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~jdg/
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/
Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
