On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 08:37:12AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: > > > What are they? They need serious bugs filed against them. > > > > e.g. doc-rfc ? > > The GNU General Public Licence itself may not be modified. I hope this > doesn't mean ... Copyright licenses as legal documents may not be modified except by the holder of the Copyright under law. As such, NO license is itself able to meet the terms of the DFSG and must be excepted. -- Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Free software developer Lucas' Law: Good will always win, because evil hires the _stupid_ engineers.
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] David Starner
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Branden Robinson
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Branden Robinson
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] James Troup
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Taketoshi Sano
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Branden Robinson
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Joseph Carter
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS