On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:18:46PM -0500, David Starner wrote: > While the issues on unmodifiable non-software stuff in Debian are > not as clear-cut as Branden has made them out to be (I know of at > least a half dozen packages in main that are unmodifiable, that were > put there knowing that) What are they? They need serious bugs filed against them. -- G. Branden Robinson | If you wish to strive for peace of soul, Debian GNU/Linux | then believe; if you wish to be a [EMAIL PROTECTED] | devotee of truth, then inquire. http://www.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Friedrich Nietzsche
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] David Starner
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Branden Robinson
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Branden Robinson
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] James Troup
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Taketoshi Sano
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Branden Robinson
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Joseph Carter
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS