Le Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:25:08AM +0300, Andrei Popescu a écrit : > > the people complaining about wml did not mention what > the issues were and did not propose an alternative.
Hi Andrei, What I learn in Debian I use elsewhere, and what I learn elsewhere I use in Debian. There are exceptions such as WML, which seems to be a dead end. I think that there could be more people working on our website if it were using some system that is used by Debian contributors for their own sites or at their workplace. At least for me, I am not interested to study WML, so my contributions are limited to modify or delete pages in my area of interest, but I am not making new developments. I notice that for the part of the website I am intersted in, there is almost no development at all, and that much more content is added to wiki.debian.org. Still, I like the idea to have on www.debian.org informations for the general public and users, and on wiki.debian.org some contents more volatile and in construction. I am exploring how possible it would be to use the markdown syntax through ikiwiki to reproduce the pages under /devel/debian-med. It looks quite promising. Do you or somebody else know what are the areas of our website that crucially depend on specialised functions or scripts of WML, and if these pages are still maintained ? Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100803152129.gb30...@merveille.plessy.net
