Jens Seidel wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 06:24:17PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Jens Seidel wrote:
> > > I agree that using typographic mdash instead of - is preferred. (The
> > > last argument against it was from Joey (probably in DWN) many years ago.
> > > He argued that not all browser/fonts support it. This is no longer a
> > > valid argument and we should report bugs against the fonts if we notice
> > > it.)
> >
> > Guess that's really long ago... Browsers should be able to convert
> > it nowadays.
>
> Now I remember a little bit better. I think you told me it is not a good
> idea to use mdash in titles only.
Aha!
> I'm not sure but I think every HTML contruct is allowed for titles as
> well (excepts of course <p>, ...)!?
It may be technically allowed but I remember having seen several
browsers not being able to render the title properly when there
are tags included. It's a while ago as well, so it may be fixed
already and not an issue today anymore.
Regards,
Joey
--
WARNING: Do not execute! This call violates patent DE10108564.
http://www.elug.de/projekte/patent-party/patente/DE10108564
wget -O patinfo-`date +"%Y%m%d"`.html http://patinfo.ffii.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
