Noah Meyerhans wrote: > (resurrecting this thread...) > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:33:14PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >>>>> A Google search for "debian upgrade reports" (no quotes) returns a page >>>>> [0] that is out of date since it is a template for a woody -> sarge >>> --> [0] is http://release.debian.org/upgrade-report.html >>> >> ... >>> That being said, attached is a patch to the current upgrade-report.html page >>> to add additional information (and do not make it depend on a specific >>> Debian >>> release). I think it's worthwhile mentioning that the user's should use >>> script if they want to provide accurate information (the Release Notes >>> already say this, but stressing this here too might lead to more useful bug >>> reports) >> Patch committed. > > The page still contains at least two references to woody. See attached > proposed patch.
I removed the references to woody, I'm not convinced about the other proposed changes, so didn't apply them. > Is that page intended to be used as a template while etch is still > "testing", or after the etch release when people are upgrading from > oldstable to stable? If the latter, then it should also be updated to > refer to the latest stable release notes, rather than > http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes (I can see how > one might argue that we no longer need the upgrade reports after etch > is released, but I don't know that I agree.) It's always possible to change the template after release ;-) Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
