Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If someone doesn't agree that this is an order of magnitude too > optimistic, I'll point to http://lwn.net/Articles/149976/
That article is known to contain basic errors. See, for example, http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/2005/09/09 indolence log, by Anthony Towns or the comments from the article, even. > Actually, "Debian takes security very seriously." is just a questionable That's a bit low. > statement, but giving a statistic that wrong about it just kills > credibility. Please explain how you know that the statistic is "that wrong". I think the statistic is questionable, so there should be verification/substantiation of the statistic, but I don't know whether it's right or wrong. I think it's prejudging things to delete the first paragraph as suggested. Hope that helps, -- MJ Ray - personal email, see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ irc.oftc.net/slef Jabber/SIP ask -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
