-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 19.11.2005 um 07:44 schrieb Filipus Klutiero:
If someone doesn't agree that this is an order of magnitude too
optimistic, I'll point to http://lwn.net/Articles/149976/
I see some problems with theat article, you are referencing here:
1. It has no issue date (from the comments I guess, it was 8th of
Septemper
2. The data is selective
3. One fix is listed (apache) for red hat which was not issued at
08th of september and three days later fixed in red hat than the
Debian fix was out. So obviously the article was changed later
without pointing the reader to that.
Right below the article you can see that there are issues fixed
within _one_ day for Debian. So even, if some fixes take longer (what
ever may be the reason) the average time may still be correct though.
I suggest to close the bug if there is no more substantial
information about the sentence being totally wrong.
greetings
Jutta
- --
http://www.witch.westfalen.de
http://witch.muensterland.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkN/VQMACgkQOgZ5N97kHkeT0ACeP4dKYkteWTcovvRr9wBjFbem
oFgAoL0Mn4es4SaE6EzFqPZuhyIhJoiS
=mVdq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
