Your message dated Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:26:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Patch applied
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2004 12:28:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 23 04:28:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de [134.99.176.3] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AvFCJ-000124-00; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 04:28:32 -0800
Received: from zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-1) with
ESMTP id i1NCSSV1026396;
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:28:28 +0100
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-1) with
ESMTP id i1NCSSal026392;
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:28:28 +0100
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:28:28 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Please add another link to m68k-build to the m68k port page
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 2004-02-23
Attn. webmasters: skip to the *********** if you don't want the gory
details please :-)
> I've looked on lists.debian.org and in the developers reference and I
> haven't found the information I was looking for, so I just guessed
> (wrongly) that debian-m68k was the right place. Yes, I had not googled
> for "debian m68k autobuild", and so? Don't you think that the need to
> google for the information I was looking for is an indicator of some
> kind of misinformation some where?
I agree, of course. Only that problem comes up often enough even on other
lists that I had expected the answer to be easier to find.
**************************************************************************
The m68k-build address should be added to the 'status' section, under
"The Debian/68k autobuild system contains up to date information about the
porting effort."
**************************************************************************
> Please note that I'm not stating that this misinformation is your fault,
> but only that is not so incredible that someone can be trapped in these
> kind of mistakes.
I didn't take it that way, and I didn't intend for the reply to go to
debian-68k, that was a mistake. I still maintain that google should be
added to the developers reference, though. It is a resource that's still
underestimated.
Michael
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 234358-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Feb 2004 00:26:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 28 16:26:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AxEms-0001P4-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:26:30 -0800
Received: from pd9e39cfd.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.156.253]
helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AxEmr-0008Sp-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:26:29 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AxEml-0007eI-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:26:23 +0100
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:26:23 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Patch applied
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level:
I applied my proposed patch, so this bug can be closed.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
