Package: www.debian.org
Version: 2004-02-23
Attn. webmasters: skip to the *********** if you don't want the gory
details please :-)
> I've looked on lists.debian.org and in the developers reference and I
> haven't found the information I was looking for, so I just guessed
> (wrongly) that debian-m68k was the right place. Yes, I had not googled
> for "debian m68k autobuild", and so? Don't you think that the need to
> google for the information I was looking for is an indicator of some
> kind of misinformation some where?
I agree, of course. Only that problem comes up often enough even on other
lists that I had expected the answer to be easier to find.
**************************************************************************
The m68k-build address should be added to the 'status' section, under
"The Debian/68k autobuild system contains up to date information about the
porting effort."
**************************************************************************
> Please note that I'm not stating that this misinformation is your fault,
> but only that is not so incredible that someone can be trapped in these
> kind of mistakes.
I didn't take it that way, and I didn't intend for the reply to go to
debian-68k, that was a mistake. I still maintain that google should be
added to the developers reference, though. It is a resource that's still
underestimated.
Michael
