Your message dated Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close packages.debian.org Bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2003 11:20:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 15 05:20:18 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-213-023-020-112.arcor-ip.net [213.23.20.112]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Ylaj-0001hK-00; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 05:20:18 -0600
Received: from scorpion by dsl-213-023-020-112.arcor-ip.net with local (Exim
3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18YlZz-0000fu-00; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:19:31 +0100
From: Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: search on packages.debian.org doesn't find
kernel-pcmcia-modules
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:19:31 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-01-15
Severity: normal
When I search in packages directories on packages.debian.org, I can not
find any packages if I use the keyword "kernel-pcmcia-modules" . I don't
know where the exact problem is, but there are a lot of packages whose
names start with "kernel-pcmcia-modules". However, the search gives no
results.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux thinkpad 2.4.20 #2 Thu Dec 5 00:08:38 CET 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 172055-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 20:34:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 14:34:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46R-00079S-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:35:43 -0600
Received: from pd9e39249.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.146.73] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1Ag46Q-000059-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:43 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46H-0001Af-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Close packages.debian.org Bugs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level:
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Last week the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs:
Closes: #224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not restored=20
* New search_packages script
Closes: #35765: packages.debian.org: text (HTML) that's on each page shou=
ld be excluded from description search=20
Closes: #103694: packages.debian.org: search_packages: doesn't search on s=
ubwords in package names
Closes: #115004, #156794, #175644, #178831 merged bugs
Closes: #172055: packages.debian.org: search_packages: search error on e.g=
. openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de
Closes: #176837 merged bug
Closes: #195614: packages.debian.org: search_packages: not finding package=
"check"=20
* Contain information about non-i386 packages
Closes: #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
Closes: #23350 merged bug
Closes: #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated
* Include DDTP translations
* Better parsing/using of input data
Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared
* Handle virtual packages
Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing dependencies.
Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead
to doubled dependencies
* Create an alternative compressed text list of all packages
Closes: #177669: packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big
* Minor fixes:
Closes: #125976: packages.debian.org: it shouldn't print header for
related packages when none of them exist
Closes: #162588: packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified timezone
Closes: #219653: packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug Closes:
#221114: packages.debian.org: Spelling error in packages overview
I will leave "#224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not
restored" open until search_packages is back, too.
Special thanks to Joey for his work to get this done and to Joy for his
feedback while writing the scripts.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
--=20
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAAr7FQbn06FtxPfARApq7AKDHf46WpZCSgaxWUsP8JQ294ZSwEgCgtdvu
UiYOrOUz35FAOsxby6X+pS4=
=D8Eb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--
