Your message dated Tue, 24 Dec 2002 18:21:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2002 14:34:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 08 09:34:24 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns1.greenbush.com [216.220.232.4]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 175SWN-0005Ef-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 09:34:23 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by ns1.greenbush.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) id KAA01361;
Wed, 8 May 2002 10:34:23 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lists.debian.org: The instructions for unsubscribing are incomplete
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 10:34:08 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: lists.debian.org
Version: 20020508
Severity: wishlist
The instructions on http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ should mention
that an unsubscription request should be sent from the address
that is subscribed, or, if that is not possible, the Subject: header
should be: "unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]".
Perhaps this information should also be included in the
information that is sent when a subscription is confirmed.
Almost every day someone complains on deb-user that
unsubscription doesn't work. I suspect the problem is often sending
unsubscription requests from an address other than the one that is
subscribed.
-- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux
bobspc 2.2.14 #1 Fri Apr 7 20:44:23 EDT 2000 i586 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 146270-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2002 17:20:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 24 11:20:03 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vsmtp1.tin.it (smtp1.cp.tin.it) [212.216.176.221]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Qsio-0000rU-00; Tue, 24 Dec 2002 11:20:02 -0600
Received: from donald.duckburg.org (80.116.90.254) by smtp1.cp.tin.it (6.5.029)
id 3DEDBCA00082133F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 24 Dec 2002 18:19:52
+0100
Received: by donald.duckburg.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A88D93EB92; Tue, 24 Dec 2002 18:21:14 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 18:21:14 +0100
From: Davide Puricelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Operating-System: Linux donald.duckburg.org 2.4.20-donald2
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=5.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,SUBJ_MISSING,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I added a note about this thing on http://www.debian.org/MailingLists,
thanks for your report.
Best Regards,
--=20
Davide Puricelli, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Developer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.debian.org
Undergraduate Student of Computer Science at University of Bologna
PGP key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+CJeKt3FMESjlf3ARAjoiAKCYVd8uaovB3u/KY5cUbOMJYy9ibgCgquWT
d3300M/mfbGzzyzFElfmz20=
=nMyC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--
