Your message dated Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:07:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2002 16:09:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 26 11:09:54 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host217-36-114-14.in-addr.btopenworld.com (ella.aferrier)
[217.36.114.14]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17jMR8-0003nP-00; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 11:09:54 -0500
Received: from laura.aferrier ([192.168.0.10])
by ella.aferrier with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17jMR6-0000KA-00; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 17:09:52 +0100
Received: (nullmailer pid 22898 invoked by uid 1000);
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:09:52 -0000
Subject: www.debian.org: Inaccurate listing of BTS tags
From: Andrew Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.50
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 17:09:52 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-26
Severity: minor
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-refcard contains an
out-of-date listing of BTS tags; for example, sarge and upstream
both exist now. Also, I think an explanation of what the tags
mean, or a link to one, would be useful here.
Regards,
Andrew.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux laura 2.4.18 #1 Thu Jun 27 18:43:52 BST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_UK, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 158368-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2002 14:07:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 25 08:07:38 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vsmtp4.tin.it (smtp4.cp.tin.it) [212.216.176.224]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18GJth-0006uT-00; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 08:07:37 -0600
Received: from donald.duckburg.org (80.116.90.182) by smtp4.cp.tin.it (6.5.029)
id 3DDD788A0010E513 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:07:05
+0100
Received: by donald.duckburg.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 898023EBA5; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:07:50 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:07:50 +0100
From: Davide Puricelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Operating-System: Linux donald.duckburg.org 2.4.19-donald5
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.1 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,SUBJ_MISSING,
USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Hi, the page was updated, thanks for your report.
Best Regards,
--
Davide Puricelli, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Developer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.debian.org
Undergraduate Student of Computer Science at University of Bologna
PGP key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
