* Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-14 16:31]: > Your patch looks fine.
Thanks. > No, it must go templates.pot, otherwise all files displaying "More > information" have to depend on ports.pot No, sorry. With that I was not refering to "More information". That one should definitely go into templates, no doubt. I am rather refering to stings like these: -msgid "Vendor/Name" -msgid "Date announced" -msgid "Clock" -msgid "ICache" -msgid "DCache" -msgid "TLB" -msgid "ISA" -msgid "Specials" -msgid "No FPU (R2010), external caches" -msgid "No FPU (R3010)" -msgid "Virtual indexed L1 cache, L2 cache controller" -msgid "External L1 cache" -msgid "Multiple chip CPU" -msgid "Mips16 isa extension, No FPU, 512k flash, 16k ram, DMAC, UART, Timer, I2C, Watchdog" ...... Apply the patch, remake the ports.pot file and do the following: $> cvs diff ports.pot | grep ^-msgid Those should go into ports rather than into templates, don't you think so? Have fun, Alfie -- Also, dass du mich als Script Kiddie beschimpfst überseh ich einfach mal. Also ich hab gelesen, dass bestimmte Backdoors auf den Source-Port reagieren und nichtmehr auf den Ziel-Port. -- damn66 in "Source-Port festlegen" auf linux-community.de
pgpmfYUgzur8o.pgp
Description: PGP signature