* Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 18:35]: > Gerfried Fuchs: >> Well, I'd like to know what ‹ and › should be. Should they >> be some special kind of opening and closing quotes? > > I think that they are supposed to be ‹ and ›, i.e that > someone by mistake have taken windows-1252 codepoints and put them in > a &#nnn;.
That's fine with me, I thought of such strange things already. >> Uhm, in my galeon I see them now as < and > > > The characters that I think it should be are: > > 2039 SINGLE LEFT-POINTING ANGLE QUOTATION MARK > 203A SINGLE RIGHT-POINTING ANGLE QUOTATION MARK Nevertheless it's still in a context where it should be data a user has to enter somehwere. I don't think that people usually insert that kind of things, do you? Or are they there to show that the user should change the things in between including the <>? Then the word in between should be written in between <em> or such to let the people know. I don't see any difference in w3m/galeon between <> and ‹›, do you? Have fun, Alfie -- "Das einzige intuitive Interface ist der Mutternippel. Alles andere ist gelernt" -- sinngemaesse Wiedergabe aus comp.irgendwas.interfaces
pgpv9B4Te8i65.pgp
Description: PGP signature