Hi.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
at Tue, 30 May 2000 23:39:06 +0200,
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The `modified BSD license' doesn't exist anymore -- the modification has
> been included in the new version of the `ordinary' BSD license. If you're
> running potato, look at /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD file, notice how
> there's no `advertising clause'.
It's cool.
> Therefore, I have taken the liberty to update the web pages accordingly.
> Editing the translations was quite simple, I don't think anything went
> wrong, except perhaps for he Japanese translation, I really can't parse it
> well. Please check it out (intro/free.wml and intro/license_disc.wml) and
> correct any errors I may have done.
I check intro/license_disk.wml, and it has
<LI><A HREF="../misc/bsd.license">BSD style license</A>.
<BR>
<B>SUMMARY:</B> Binaries and source code must contain the license;
advertising must acknowledge the developers listed in the
license
<BR>
Is this OK ? If the "BSD style license" does not have "advertising clause",
should we remove the sentence above "advertising must acknowledge
the developers listed in the license", then ?
I checked the Japanese translation also, there is no translation for
license_disk.wml. In free.wml, it seems to be enough just to remove
the List Item for modified BSD license. I will do it later for Japanese
translation of free.wml.
--
Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
