>*Darren O. Benham wrote: >> Why not make it part of the wml system?
> I looked at the cover page for wml. I am not sure wether it is >well suited. Probably yes. The pages are mostly very long lists. >They are generated by overly-complicated perl scripts. The links >at top and bottom could be standard. They are added by hand >at this point (I thinkd Adam diC. did it). > Unfortunatley, I don't want to take the time now to convert the >pages. I don't know if I can find the time before the next release. > > In the interim, the easiest solution would be to give me >write access to a directory, and I can update it manually every >week. I agree with John. I don't think there's a very good match between WML and his system because the reports are pretty much hand-generated at John's discretion, and because those reports require up-to-date access to packages files.... I guess it could be done but I haven't looked into it. It would be complex -- you'd want to make sure we don't rebuild the reports every day. Anyhow it's a whole ball of wax. AFAIK, most of the bulk "derived" pages such as the mail list archives are not in CVS nor WML. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
