Francesco Poli wrote: > I hope that we can find a better way to keep track of past debian-legal > discussions: otherwise we are at risk of forgetting the issues that were > discovered and/or deciding in inconsistent ways about similar clauses...
I've noted before that it sounds to me more like a catalogue of discussions is wanted. Unfortunately, we don't seem to know at the time which discussions are significant, or at least it is difficult to get consensus on it. I think the FAQ and other works in progress are useful and it has been encouraging to see work on new FAQs like documentation recently. If debian-legal contributors keep notes on their own sites (as I do), it may be useful to link them: what do others think or have? -- MJ Ray (slef), K.Lynn, England, email via http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
