On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 02:33:02AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Since this hasn't really worked out I propose to delete this stuff again > > until someone comes up with a better idea how to better present the > > work of debian-legal. > > I support deleting the summaries. I think that page would > be good for a general description of how debian-legal works, > linking to unofficial documents as they are prepared and official > documents on other parts of the site. I had intended to write > this before, but I am still not up-to-date with wml. > > Here is my suggested text: [...]
Committed with minor corrections. Feel free to send further patches in my direction :) > <p>Licenses currently found in debian main include:</p> > > <ul> > <li>GNU General Public License (common)</li> > <li>GNU Lesser General Public License (common)</li> > <li>GNU Library General Public License (common)</li> > <li>Modified BSD License (common)</li> > <li>Perl Artistic license (common)</li> > <li>Apache License</li> > <li>MIT/X11-style licenses</li> > <li>zlib-style licenses</li> > <li>LaTeX Project Public License</li> > <li>Python Software Foundation License</li> > <li>Ruby's License</li> > <li>Glasgow Haskell Compiler License</li> > <li>PHP License</li> > <li>W3C Software Notice and License</li> > <li>OpenSSL License</li> > <li>Sleepycat License</li> > <li>Common UNIX Printing System License Agreement</li> > <li>vhf Public License</li> > <li>"No problem Bugroff" license</li> > <li>public domain (not a license, strictly speaking)</li> > </ul> Would it make sense to add links to the licenses here where possible? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
