This one time, at band camp, Éric Araujo said: > >> I've cc'd weasel and sgran so they can answer the following question: is > >> it acceptable to have non-DDs (and/or non-DMs) on such aliases? > > > > Yes, it's an alias file, so it can take arbitrary addresses. > > I believe the question was about policy, not technique.
Yes, I understood that - I think it's a non-issue, so didn't address it. I apologize if that left the situation ambiguous. What we don't want, in general, is for an email address @*.d.o to be handed out for trivial or status reasons. What is fine is for role accounts to redirect mail to people actually doing the work. As examples, firstname.lastn...@women.debian.org redirecting to firstname.lastn...@gmail.com is probably not fine, but ment...@women.debian.org redirecting to a gmail address absolutely is, in my opinion. Hope that makes my position clearer, and sorry again for any misunderstanding. Cheers, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sg...@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
