On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 03:28:34PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Its an already existing tool. But indeed an interesting question.
It is an existing tool, ... which was going to disappear. So I think
it is reasonable to ask whether it should really be saved or not.
> > If the check is all it does, it looks like a simple "--check" option
> > can be added to tagpending to achieve the same effect.
>
> I don't know if this matches the use-case. AFAICS yacls is meant to
> be used as a dput hook or so, to tell you "OH! WAIT! You are gonna
> close the wrong bugs if you really upload now"
Yep, that's clear. The reasoning for associating the two is that
blatantly they deal with the same entities: last changelog entry, BTS
inquiry about open bugs and owning packages. Before joining the burden
of maintaining both, now in the same package, I cannot help thinking
whether there is an alternative :-)
Regarding your dput hook use case, which is a really interesting one,
I don't see a problem in that hook being encoded as "tagpending
--check", you write once, you stop thinking about it forever.
That said, I do agree that the name of the tool (tagpending) could
become non-intuitive. So my proposal is to actually add the option to
tagpending *and* to have an additional symlink under /usr/bin,
pointing to tagpending, which would just mimic the (future) behavior
of the tagpending check. How does that sound?
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
