Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you think it's worth fixing #436761 (tramp fails with wholenump > error on xemacs21), or should tramp be removed (given that no > one's filed an ITA and emacs22 is the default)?
Given that the change is trivial[1], it's probably better to fix the bug. -- ,''`. : :' : Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ `- Footnotes: [1] http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/tramp/lisp/tramp.el?root=tramp&r1=2.359.2.91&r2=2.359.2.92&pathrev=V-2-0-56 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
