On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:42:30AM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote:
> Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Do you think it's worth fixing #436761 (tramp fails with wholenump
> > error on xemacs21), or should tramp be removed (given that no
> > one's filed an ITA and emacs22 is the default)?
>
> Given that the change is trivial[1], it's probably better to fix the
> bug.
Why don't we remove tramp entirely, given that it's included in emacs22?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
