* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > also sprach Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.07.23.2003 +0200]: > > Hmmm, I've already packaged libspf2 which is of course confusingly > > similar. I'm not really in strong contact with upstream, but is > > there a reason for these two separate libs? > > Well, apparently libspf is the established standard, and i would not > mind helping it stay so by putting it into the archive. libspf2 was > created purposely to go against libspf. apparently. > > http://moscow.6o4.ca/shevek.html > > i am not going to get involved in this. I don't see why we should > not simply provide both.
Hmmm, unfortunately I was away for the weekend and he seems to have taken the page down :( -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
