also sprach Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.07.23.2003 +0200]: > Hmmm, I've already packaged libspf2 which is of course confusingly > similar. I'm not really in strong contact with upstream, but is > there a reason for these two separate libs?
Well, apparently libspf is the established standard, and i would not mind helping it stay so by putting it into the archive. libspf2 was created purposely to go against libspf. apparently. http://moscow.6o4.ca/shevek.html i am not going to get involved in this. I don't see why we should not simply provide both. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
