* Michal Politowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040322 15:40]: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:17:13 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Eugeniy Meshcheryakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040322 14:55]: > > > I used name mozilla-thunderbird-locale-uk because of other packages > > > named such way (PACKAGE-locale-LANG), examples: > > > > Well, I connect "uk" to the united kingdom. What speaks against using > > -locale-ua, as ua _is_ the iso 3166-code for the country?
> Consistency? > Localization stuff is generally marked with the language code first, > country code may come second if it is necessary. > Eg. what do you expect to find in /usr/share/locale/uk? You probably won't like it, but _I_ expect there english stuff. (You don't need to argue with me that this expectation is illogical and wrong, but you asked me what I would expect, not what would be the right thing to do.) Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
