On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 18:21, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 13:03, Christopher Obbard <obba...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Tobias, > > > > On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 23:06, Tobias Heider <m...@tobhe.de> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 03:37:58PM GMT, Christopher Obbard wrote: > > > > I'm happy to sponsor an upload of this into the archive. I've created > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/qcom-firmware-extract and added you as > > > > a maintainer. > > > > > > Thanks! I pushed the latest version and squashed the changelog in the > > > debian/unstable branch. Decided to go with a slightly more reasonable > > > version number scheme. > > > > Not entirely sure about the high version number. > > Would it be better to choose something like 0.0~20241211-1 ? > > As a reminder, you can use epoch (1:) to switch between versioning > schemes. And -1 suffix isn't suitable for Debian namtive packages.
Sure. Tobias already mentioned my mistake about the native package suffix, it was a simple slip of the finger ;-). We can investigate adding an epoch later, if needed. For now, the existing versioning scheme is fine by me. > > > > > Reviews welcome :) > > > > Can you add me as a maintainer / uploader ? Christopher Obbard > > <obba...@debian.org> > > > > Otherwise it looks fine to me.
