On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 13:03, Christopher Obbard <obba...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi Tobias, > > On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 23:06, Tobias Heider <m...@tobhe.de> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 03:37:58PM GMT, Christopher Obbard wrote: > > > I'm happy to sponsor an upload of this into the archive. I've created > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/qcom-firmware-extract and added you as > > > a maintainer. > > > > Thanks! I pushed the latest version and squashed the changelog in the > > debian/unstable branch. Decided to go with a slightly more reasonable > > version number scheme. > > Not entirely sure about the high version number. > Would it be better to choose something like 0.0~20241211-1 ?
As a reminder, you can use epoch (1:) to switch between versioning schemes. And -1 suffix isn't suitable for Debian namtive packages. > > > Reviews welcome :) > > Can you add me as a maintainer / uploader ? Christopher Obbard > <obba...@debian.org> > > Otherwise it looks fine to me. -- With best wishes Dmitry
