Axel Beckert writes ("Re: unclutter alternatives"):
> So I'm actually very glad that someone else also has interest in
> packaging unclutter-xfixes.I'm a user of unclutter. I run it with `-noevents'. I have no idea whether the new approach is going to be a good replacement but I guess it probably is. I do wonder why this needed a whole new fresh rewrite, with a new name, and everything. Oh well. > 1) Package unclutter-xfixes with an unclutter transitional package and > upload to experimental first. That way, people who use unclutter > can test unclutter-xfixes to see if anything needs to be fixed > there to make unclutter-xfixes a drop-in replacement for unclutter. This ia a good plan. Thanks, Ian.
