Hi, Thorsten, على الثلاثاء 2 شباط 2016 04:00، كتب Thorsten Alteholz: > > there seems to be something wrong with this package. > A DFSG package should not be in non-free. >
This is the package that you rejected last November because of the non-free file dbmalloc.h [1]. The package has the +dfsg suffix because I excluded the postscript Manual.ps which cannot be built from source. It's my understanding that even non-free packages should meet the dfsg as far as possible. Would you prefer I put the Manual.ps back in so that there is no repacked tarball? Otherwise, do you have a more appropriate alternative to +dfsg for the repack suffix? Thanks and regards Afif 1. https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2015-November/036574.html -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name
