>>>>> Axel Wagner <m...@merovius.de> writes:
[…]
> I don't think Lennart personally would care, no, but I think *we*
> should care to paint the Opensource community as better than this.
As a member of the said community, I think that, however the
presence of either of the packages in Debian paints it, –
I could live with that.
Regarding the possible enhancement of XBill to allow for using a
user-specified set of sprites (whether packaged or not), –
it certainly feels like a proper solution to me. I guess the
package could then be enhanced to include several such “themes,”
including the “classic” one, the newly proposed one, and perhaps
a few more, depending on the availability and relevance.
> From that point of view, if there was a vote and I'd get a vote I
> would also vote against having xbill in the archive as being a poor
> taste ad-hominem attack (I mean, for crying out loud, there is an
> actually blood-spatter squashing animation in the game, even if it is
> a poor one). In my opinion it is certainly not an argument to also
> let xlennart in.
While not a full-scale ad-hominem attack, I’d say that the two
differences I know of between the vrms operation and the
official FSF position amount to a misrepresentation at best.
Are we going to drop that package, too?
[…]
--
FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87k30mtown....@violet.siamics.net
