On 01/16/2015 06:34 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > [...] > On 16.01.2015 14:48, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote: >>> I'd also object on the technical grounds that we already have xbill and >>> the changes in xlennart don't truly justify a fork. >> >> This could be easily solved by merging xbill with xlennart to "xperson" >> with collection of this people (bill and lennart). > > I absolutely agree with Ben here. I don't see anything special that > would justify a fork. > > However, perhaps you might want to ask the > upstream author of XBill to incorporate your changes and thus create a > more customizable game. xbill.org is still online.
I see. By the way, it's _not my_ changes. I'm just a Debian user that
tries to get more experience of Debian packaging. I found the project
("xlennart") and just wanted to make a package and find a sponsor. I
didn't expected that this will be a sore subject. I'll just switch my
attention to other projects.
Best regards, Dmitry.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
