Hi Raphael, hi Gianfranco,
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
*Betreff: *R: Bug#773656: ITP: daps -- DocBook Authoring and Publishing
Suite
*Von: *Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it>
*An: *sascha.ma...@bdvb.de, 773...@bugs.debian.org, hert...@debian.org
*Datum: *22.12.2014 15:57
is this package a duplicate then? I'm trying to "mentor" Sascha into
the debian guidelines, if you think the package is not useful please
let me know, I just told him that using the package in debian might be
useful for the community, but if a similar tool makes daps useless we
can think about not packaging it at all (Sascha, do you have an
opinion about the topic? Debian tends to avoid duplicated effort of
similar tools :-) ) cheers, Gianfranco
From my POV daps is easier to learn for bloody beginners than publicer.
But this is just my view. To have different tools to do the same people
can decide what are better for them.
In my company we're using daps doc-team-wide so it would be great if we
can providing a package for it :-)
Greetings
Sascha
--
Yours sincerly
Sascha Manns
Maifeldstraße 10
56727 Mayen
Phone: +49-1573-9242730
Email: sascha.ma...@bdvb.de
Web: http://saigkill.ddns.net/wordpress
