Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Debian does not owe anything to the FSF. We have to mind our >> own business which is to decide if we package something or >> not. Full stop. > > OTOH, Bas does not have to account to you or to anyone else in Debian for > decisions he makes as a member of the Free Software community. You seem
Where did I say it had to? Please read the thread again. I talked about Debian business, not Bas'. > to be implying that because he is a Debian developer, all of his contact > with the rest of the community must be sanctioned by the DPL. (Or > perhaps by you?) I certainly don't see anything wrong with bringing an > issue to the attention of the FSF if he thinks there has been an > oversight. If you ask me, it seems like a rather neighborly thing to do. Did you ever consider contacting upstream before doing such denouncement? Don't they have something to say? Why do you think you cannot find a solution with them? > You are right that it is not *Debian's* business to worry about non-free > software on the FSF's servers. But Debian != Bas, and Bas's business is > his own. You got it! It has nothing to do in a bug report log from our BTS: Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 23:17:21 +0200 From: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert could have done it on his own without CC'ing the BTS. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org