On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Dominique Dumont <d...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thursday 03 April 2014 00:28:46 Per Andersson wrote: >> I have created a fix and forwarded it for upstream inclusion >> >> https://github.com/tmm1/pygments.rb/pull/119 >> >> When this is accepted upstream I intend to go forth with repackaging >> the upstream tarball and removing the vendor directory entirely. > > Hmm, looks like this pb revolves around the adaptation done upstream to cope > with Debian idiosyncrasies.
I have not tested this on anything other then Debian but it looks like a regression to me. The pull request actually removes Debian specific invokation. Check the comment for the python_binary method. > Instead of pushing upstream to cope with Debian, I'd rather let upstream keep > thing simple (and portable). Then as Debian packager, I would create patches > to adapt upstream to Debian. I am using it to patch the Debian package. If upstream decides to include it: great! If not, we carry the patch. -- Per -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CABYrXSSykz4z-h=ycm9ioslwwhvo9x1jkxc6i75gyrq_djw...@mail.gmail.com
