Hi, Quoting Stéphane Glondu (2014-01-18 15:32:07) > I started to have a look, and for sure the copyright file is incorrect. > There is a lot of copyright to "Jun Furuse" and OCamlPro, those two > should at least be mentioned. Actually, I didn't see (after a quick > look) any copyright owned by the ones you mentioned in debian/copyright > (Thomas and Fabrice work for OCamlPro and/or Inria, but the copyright > seems to belong to the company and Inria). There are also some other > bits from other people, you have to be sure that at least license is the > same.
Sorry for not having been more thorough before. My confusion comes from blocks like these: --%<--------------------------------------------------------------------------- (**************************************************************************) (* *) (* TypeRex OCaml Studio *) (* Thomas Gazagnaire, Fabrice Le Fessant *) (* *) (* OCaml *) (* Xavier Leroy, projet Cristal, INRIA Rocquencourt *) (* *) (* Copyright 2011-2012 OCamlPro *) (* Copyright 1996-2011 INRIA. *) (* All rights reserved. This file is distributed under the terms of *) (* the Lesser GNU Public License version 3.0. *) (* *) (* TypeRex is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, *) (* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of *) (* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the *) (* Lesser GNU General Public License for more details. *) (* *) (**************************************************************************) (* ADMIN: fabrice *) (***********************************************************************) (* *) (* Objective Caml *) (* *) (* Xavier Leroy, projet Cristal, INRIA Rocquencourt *) (* *) (* Copyright 1996 Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et *) (* en Automatique. All rights reserved. This file is distributed *) (* under the terms of the Q Public License version 1.0. *) (* *) (***********************************************************************) -->%--------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is unclear to me under what terms the content of a file with that header can be distributed. > I am still reviewing the technical part, but I preferred to tell you > about the copyright issue first. Sorry again for having been too shallow with this. Mehdi Dogguy was right with pointing out that I should be careful copyright/license questions. I'll look over all of it again and try to find out from where precisely each piece of code is coming from. cheers, josch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140118162104.10850.95446@hoothoot
