This packages seems in a quite good situation. Is it? The boost transition will effect this package. Is it will be need to bump package name then?
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:33 PM, David Paleino <da...@debian.org> wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > I request an adopter for the mapnik package. The package is currently > maintained within the Debian GIS Team, CCed. > > The package description is: > Mapnik is an OpenSource C++/Python toolkit for developing GIS > (Geographic Information Systems) applications. At the core is a C++ > shared library providing algorithms/patterns for spatial data access and > visualization. > . > Essentially a collection of geographic objects (map, layer, datasource, > feature, geometry), the library doesn't rely on "windowing systems" and > is intended to work in multi-threaded environments > . > High-level Python bindings (boost.python) facilitate rapid application > development, targeting zope3, django, etc. > . > This package contains the development headers, API documentation, and > build utilities. > > > > -- > . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino > : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ > `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal > `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 -- YunQiang Su -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKcpw6WFQh-mTSWMjB8e=WwJFqqsoL13ggNE3-jYQ0nHcYE=9...@mail.gmail.com
