On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:15:16AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > I have currently started improving the packaging a bit and found the > package name really confusing and distracting. Could we please > rename the package to "prboom-plus" just as upstream calls the > project itself? We could, of course, keep the symlinks to "prboom+" > binary and manpage, but as a Debian package name I find it really > unsuitable.
That's disappointing. The idea of the package being "prboom-plus" really rankles with me, e.g. imagine if bonnie++ was "bonnie-plus-plus", libstdc++6 libstdc-plus-plus-6 etc. However packaging practicalities are important. Let me look over your commits today and then I'll get back to you whether I'm happy to rename it or not. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121130103806.GD5807@debian
