On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 09:22:55PM +0200, Martin Erik Werner wrote: > On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 18:56 +0000, Bart Martens wrote: > (...) > > I'm unmerging the ITPs for gvl and lierolibre because these seem different > > softwares. Let me know if I'm wrong about this. In case you meant that > > there > > won't be any need to package "gvl" anymore, then please close it's ITP. > > I created a fork/branch of gvl[0] (due to inactive upstream) and is > currently packaging this as an integral part of lierolibre (gvl was > pretty much always meant as being tied to liero, and _very_ unfit to be > a shared lib). > > Hence I figured it made logical sense to merge the ITPs, since that's > what's happening in practice with the code... You think it's better to > close the ITP in this case? > > [0] https://gitorious.org/lierolibre/gvl
If you no longer intend to package gvl separately, then it is best to close 648682 now. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120607194455.gj19...@master.debian.org
