On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 18:56 +0000, Bart Martens wrote: (...) > I'm unmerging the ITPs for gvl and lierolibre because these seem different > softwares. Let me know if I'm wrong about this. In case you meant that there > won't be any need to package "gvl" anymore, then please close it's ITP.
I created a fork/branch of gvl[0] (due to inactive upstream) and is currently packaging this as an integral part of lierolibre (gvl was pretty much always meant as being tied to liero, and _very_ unfit to be a shared lib). Hence I figured it made logical sense to merge the ITPs, since that's what's happening in practice with the code... You think it's better to close the ITP in this case? [0] https://gitorious.org/lierolibre/gvl -- Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwer...@gmail.com>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
