Hello Wouter, Should I submit an RFA against this package? What should be the next steps. Can you also jot down the next TODO for the package, on which I should work. That only makes it meaningful for adopting.
On Fri, February 10, 2012 12:48 pm, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> But I can adopt to dh7 style rules. And coming to the copyright file, >> it is not in the dep5 machine readable format. May be making this into a >> dep5 would be wise. > > I'm not very fond of the dep5 thing; but if you're willing to do the > work... well, you'd be the maintainer... I thought this is a mandate. So I proposed this. I heard that all the packages would be transformed to the dep5 thing. If not I don't have any personal inclination towards dep5. > it's on alioth, in ~wouter/aspic.git, if I'm not mistaken. Maybe I should I am sorry. I couldn't find it out at that location. >> Looking for more inputs from you and also requesting a review and >> sponsor of my packages mentioned in my previous mail. > > I haven't forgotten; I just haven't had the time for that yet. Thanks. Sincerely, -- Medhamsh Hacktivist | http://medhamsh.org BD16 E32E CA4D 83A3 1270 725D D766 7997 0ABC 20E9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/33456.14.139.82.6.1329202159.squir...@mail.medhamsh.org
