merge 569203 607973 quit On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 02:59:06PM -0430, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > There is/was a previous ITP for parti. Please see #569203.
I'm terribly sorry, yet I did search the wnpp bugs today before I filed the ITP. I was searching for parti-all though, so I missed your ITP. > IMO, the parti window manager is not ready to be used by end > users. However, xpra is very usable but it has some issues > with keyboard management. I use this tool ocassionally > without issues. My main interest is xpra indeed. > Anyway, the previous ITP only provides two binary packages > (parti and python-wimpiggy). If there is any interest in > Debian to upload this package I don't really care if this is > maintained under collab-maint or PAPT but I would like to be > involved as co-maintainer. I've done some commits into PAPT SVN repository [1], I see that you & Michael Schutte some work in git [2]. Although I prefer git over SVN, yet I think it's better to have it maintained under PAPT. I have a question, is this: python make_constants_pxi.py wimpiggy/lowlevel/constants.txt wimpiggy/lowlevel/constants.pxi really necessary ? I know that setup.py mentions it in the comments, yet the Ubuntu package didn't run that, yet the build is successful and the package works. > I think as next step to have this available in Debian, we > should contact upstream to know their plans about the future > of this software. I did send him an email few hours ago. Will forward it to you shortly. [1] svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/python-apps/packages/parti-all/trunk [2] git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/parti.git -- أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Digital design engineer GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
