On 06/16/2010 10:33 AM, David Paleino wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:23:53 -0700, Ludovico Cavedon wrote: > *cough* David senza "e" finale :D *cough*
Ops, sorry, do la colpa all'autocompletion delle mie mani :) >> I also a have basic package ready, but I still have to prepare the >> manpage for the jtb command, fill the copyright file and add a maven pom >> file. > > I have a manpage ready, attaching it to this bugreport. Awesome, thanks! >> Moreover it is not clear to me which version is the right one to package: >> On [1] the latest version is 1.3.2, from 2005, probably no longer >> maintained. >> Looks like that [2] took over development of jtb, distributing version >> 1.4.3.2. > > Ok, I didn't know about the eclipse fork of jtb. > >> So I would be inclined to distribute the latter. > > Yes, I agree. > >> However the only reason I am packaging jtb is beacuse it is used by >> javacc-maven-plugin, which actually use 1.3.2. Therefore I need to make >> sure that it works with 1.4.3.2. >> >> The only reason I want to package jtb is because it is a chain >> dependency of htmlunit, and I am not java-involved :). > > Ah :) > > <sarcasm>Where's the pkg-java team, in all this? :)</sarcasm> Well, I joined the pkg-java ML, but did not actually asked someone to package it. I was planning to do the initial work myself, but if someone from the pkg-team wants to take on maintainership, I would be happy with that. Ciao, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c1948ef.7050...@debian.org
