On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:29:34AM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote: > Heya, > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 03:21:58PM +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > > Sebastian Harl wrote: > > > Thanks for your interest and offering your help! To be honest, I'm > > > not sure about what needs to be done at the moment. > > > > Normally when adopting a package I would start by: > > > > - triaging any open bugs; > > - adopting dpkg source format 3.0 (quilt); > > - adopting dh(1) for debian/rules; > > - uupdating to a new upstream (if any); and finally > > - adopting DEP-5 for debian/copyright and updating it. > > > > I'll leave this (graphviz) at the bottom of my IN tray for now; if I > > get around to working on it, I'll send patches to you rather than > > applying them directly. This will give you a chance to veto anything > > you don't like. > > Great! I'm not convinced about 3.0 (quilt) yet, so I'd prefer not to use > that for graphviz. Anything else sounds good to me, though. > > Thanks again for your interest! >
In the meantime you organize the new maintianership for graphviz, I am going to do a QA upload addressing at least #493974. Package FTBFS currently and it is necesary getting it buildeable becaus it is stalling ongoing porting efforts. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
