On Mon, Jun 17, 2024, 08:18 Judit Foglszinger <ur...@riseup.net> wrote:

> > A few more weeks, eh?
> >
> > To me, it seems like we're intentionally avoiding the GR process because
> we
> > don't like the process and have decided to simply ignore it for the sake
> of
> > extending the discussion.
>
> Technically, the GR process advantages the ones proposing a GR
> for giving them more time to think things trough,
> while the others are restricted to the short discussion period.
>
> So doing it like this is more fair play.
>

My understanding was that the modified timeline was for the benefit of the
list, and not to create an advantage for the drafter. I apologize for this
misunderstanding.

>

Reply via email to